Leaders | Supreme sort

Why affirmative action in American universities had to go

And why what comes after could be better

People walk on the campus of the University of North Carolina
Image: Getty Images

SHOULD CITIZENS be treated differently based on the colour of their skin? Most people would say not, but others insist that they should—if the ends are sufficiently enlightened.

Not long after America dismantled over two centuries of slavery and segregation, it embarked on a project of “affirmative action”: legally sanctioned positive discrimination for African-Americans (later expanded to other “under-represented minorities”) who wanted to go to selective universities. At the time, the affront to liberal norms of fairness and equality under the law was assuaged by the fact that the people who stood to benefit had been oppressed. Yet after 50 years with more racial progress than setbacks, an applicant to America’s top universities with the right skin colour still has a much better chance of getting in than one with identical credentials but the wrong skin colour. On June 29th the Supreme Court ended the scheme.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline "Affirmative action had to go"

The future of war: A special report

From the July 8th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

How to pacify the world’s most violent region

The iron-fist approach will not solve Latin America’s gang-violence problem

Why South Africans are fed up after 30 years of democracy

After a bright start the ANC has proved incapable of governing for the whole country


How disinformation works—and how to counter it

More co-ordination is needed, and better access to data